<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overclockblocked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sumitsays.com/2009/02/06/overclockblocked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/02/06/overclockblocked/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit Dam</title>
		<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/02/06/overclockblocked/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit Dam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumitsays.com/?p=179#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve left it a bit late (been a crazy-busy week), but welcome to anyone who&#039;s been pointed this way by Metafilter, Reddit or any of the other places that this story&#039;s been posted. Thanks for visiting. And many thanks in particular to &lt;a href=&quot;http://mike.whybark.com/&quot; title=&quot;Home page of Mike Whybark, Esquire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mike Whybark&lt;/a&gt;, for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you&quot; title=&quot;spammen all over you, on MetaFilter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;getting the ball rolling&lt;/a&gt;. &#160;

I greatly enjoyed reading the comments in the MeFi thread (my personal favourite was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442209&quot; title=&quot;&quot;2leet;dr&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;). Many were very astute, as you&#039;d expect from MeFi, even - or perhaps especially - the critical ones. Potomac Avenue nailed both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442237&quot; title=&quot;Riddley Walker&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inspiration&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442358&quot; title=&quot;&quot;he&#039;s imagined a world based on a lexicon, rather than the more traditional SF vice-versa&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;intention&lt;/a&gt;, while everichon put up a better &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442338&quot; title=&quot;&quot;The plot is slight, and the stakes are low, but that&#039;s ok--it is an amuse-gueule of a tale.&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;defence&lt;/a&gt; of the story than I&#039;d probably have managed.

So what was I going to&#160; say? Oh yeah, the self-indulgent Author&#039;s Note, for anyone who&#039;s interested. I&#039;d been thinking idly for a while about a story in which several of our science-fictional wishes - teleportation, telepathy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism&quot; title=&quot;Transhumanism on Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;transhumanism&lt;/a&gt; - were all granted at once. I wanted to write it in a way that&#039;d capture how radically different the people of that world would be to us, but how could I do that and still make it comprehensible to us meat puppets? I didn&#039;t want to cop-out and tell the story from the perspective of an &quot;unaltered&quot; narrator.

Then I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocelotfactory.com/hoban/cowart1.html&quot; title=&quot;The Terror of History: Riddley Walker&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this essay&lt;/a&gt;, which touches on Russell Hoban&#039;s use of language in his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.graphesthesia.com/rw/&quot; title=&quot;Riddley Walker Annotations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;superb book&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Riddley Walker&lt;/i&gt;, which is famously written in the opaque broken-English dialect of a tribe scrabbling to survive in post-apocalyptic Kent. David Cowart argues that Hoban isn&#039;t actually trying to create a plausible futuristic language: neo-primitives, thousands of years from now, would surely not think as we do, or speak any language we could understand.

Instead,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;the text of &lt;i&gt;Riddley Walker&lt;/i&gt; deploys vaguely familiar vocabulary so that we can understand the mindset of Riddley Walker - offering us referents we can assimilate, and an implied etymology that allows us to imagine how Hoban&#039;s future world evolved from the one we know. The language isn&#039;t &quot;realistic&quot;, as such: it&#039;s more like reading in translation.

I didn&#039;t think consciously about trying to do something similar, but it&#039;s probably no coincidence that I wrote &lt;i&gt;Overclockblocked&lt;/i&gt; during one of my &lt;a title=&quot;A Million Monkeys&quot; href=&quot;http://www.millionmonkeys.org.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;regular Monday night writing sessions&lt;/a&gt; a few weeks later. I wanted to keep the plot slight, both because I thought it&#039;d be amusing to dress it up and because I wanted there to be a core that readers could relate to. Ultimately I picked a simple retelling of one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BoyMeetsGirl&quot; title=&quot;TV Topes - Boy Meets Girl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most familiar of all stories&lt;/a&gt;. 

(I was briefly tempted to homage &lt;a title=&quot;Disaster Area, from The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide To The Galaxy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.earthstar.co.uk/area.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Douglas Adams&#039; version&lt;/a&gt; of that trope - &quot;boy-being meets girl-being under a silvery moon which then explodes for no adequately explored reason&quot; - but thought that would be Too Much. The silvery moon made it in, though.)

The story then hung around for a couple of weeks - I wasn&#039;t particularly satisfied with it - before I decided on a whim to &lt;a title=&quot;post it as an entry&quot; href=&quot;http://blog.tate.org.uk/unilever2008/?p=304&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post it as an entry&lt;/a&gt; to Tate Modern&#039;s &lt;i&gt;TH.2058 &lt;/i&gt;competition. And then regretted it, since it didn&#039;t really have much to do with the competition theme - and I couldn&#039;t take it down. So I decided that since it was out in the wild, I might as well post it here. Where I thought little more about it until I noticed a spike in my traffic, coming from MetaFilter. And I think that&#039;s where we came in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve left it a bit late (been a crazy-busy week), but welcome to anyone who&#8217;s been pointed this way by Metafilter, Reddit or any of the other places that this story&#8217;s been posted. Thanks for visiting. And many thanks in particular to <a href="http://mike.whybark.com/" title="Home page of Mike Whybark, Esquire" rel="nofollow">Mike Whybark</a>, for <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you" title="spammen all over you, on MetaFilter" rel="nofollow">getting the ball rolling</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>I greatly enjoyed reading the comments in the MeFi thread (my personal favourite was <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442209" title="&quot;2leet;dr&quot;" rel="nofollow">this one</a>). Many were very astute, as you&#8217;d expect from MeFi, even &#8211; or perhaps especially &#8211; the critical ones. Potomac Avenue nailed both the <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442237" title="Riddley Walker" rel="nofollow">inspiration</a> and the <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442358" title="&quot;he's imagined a world based on a lexicon, rather than the more traditional SF vice-versa&quot;" rel="nofollow">intention</a>, while everichon put up a better <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/78936/spammen-all-over-you#2442338" title="&quot;The plot is slight, and the stakes are low, but that's ok--it is an amuse-gueule of a tale.&quot;" rel="nofollow">defence</a> of the story than I&#8217;d probably have managed.</p>
<p>So what was I going to&nbsp; say? Oh yeah, the self-indulgent Author&#8217;s Note, for anyone who&#8217;s interested. I&#8217;d been thinking idly for a while about a story in which several of our science-fictional wishes &#8211; teleportation, telepathy, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism" title="Transhumanism on Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">transhumanism</a> &#8211; were all granted at once. I wanted to write it in a way that&#8217;d capture how radically different the people of that world would be to us, but how could I do that and still make it comprehensible to us meat puppets? I didn&#8217;t want to cop-out and tell the story from the perspective of an &#8220;unaltered&#8221; narrator.</p>
<p>Then I read <a href="http://www.ocelotfactory.com/hoban/cowart1.html" title="The Terror of History: Riddley Walker" rel="nofollow">this essay</a>, which touches on Russell Hoban&#8217;s use of language in his <a href="http://www.graphesthesia.com/rw/" title="Riddley Walker Annotations" rel="nofollow">superb book</a> <i>Riddley Walker</i>, which is famously written in the opaque broken-English dialect of a tribe scrabbling to survive in post-apocalyptic Kent. David Cowart argues that Hoban isn&#8217;t actually trying to create a plausible futuristic language: neo-primitives, thousands of years from now, would surely not think as we do, or speak any language we could understand.</p>
<p>Instead,<i> </i>the text of <i>Riddley Walker</i> deploys vaguely familiar vocabulary so that we can understand the mindset of Riddley Walker &#8211; offering us referents we can assimilate, and an implied etymology that allows us to imagine how Hoban&#8217;s future world evolved from the one we know. The language isn&#8217;t &#8220;realistic&#8221;, as such: it&#8217;s more like reading in translation.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think consciously about trying to do something similar, but it&#8217;s probably no coincidence that I wrote <i>Overclockblocked</i> during one of my <a title="A Million Monkeys" href="http://www.millionmonkeys.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">regular Monday night writing sessions</a> a few weeks later. I wanted to keep the plot slight, both because I thought it&#8217;d be amusing to dress it up and because I wanted there to be a core that readers could relate to. Ultimately I picked a simple retelling of one of the <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BoyMeetsGirl" title="TV Topes - Boy Meets Girl" rel="nofollow">most familiar of all stories</a>. </p>
<p>(I was briefly tempted to homage <a title="Disaster Area, from The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy" href="http://www.earthstar.co.uk/area.htm" rel="nofollow">Douglas Adams&#8217; version</a> of that trope &#8211; &#8220;boy-being meets girl-being under a silvery moon which then explodes for no adequately explored reason&#8221; &#8211; but thought that would be Too Much. The silvery moon made it in, though.)</p>
<p>The story then hung around for a couple of weeks &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t particularly satisfied with it &#8211; before I decided on a whim to <a title="post it as an entry" href="http://blog.tate.org.uk/unilever2008/?p=304" rel="nofollow">post it as an entry</a> to Tate Modern&#8217;s <i>TH.2058 </i>competition. And then regretted it, since it didn&#8217;t really have much to do with the competition theme &#8211; and I couldn&#8217;t take it down. So I decided that since it was out in the wild, I might as well post it here. Where I thought little more about it until I noticed a spike in my traffic, coming from MetaFilter. And I think that&#8217;s where we came in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/02/06/overclockblocked/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumitsays.com/?p=179#comment-74</guid>
		<description>A challenging read but great to see some real experimental writing, someone trying to do something different with vocabulary and dialogue etc.  At first I was thinking this would work so much better in visual media then realised actually it needs some sort of multimedia web/film multiscreen crossover media thing like wot has not been invented yet.
Go Sumit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A challenging read but great to see some real experimental writing, someone trying to do something different with vocabulary and dialogue etc.  At first I was thinking this would work so much better in visual media then realised actually it needs some sort of multimedia web/film multiscreen crossover media thing like wot has not been invented yet.<br />
Go Sumit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah E</title>
		<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/02/06/overclockblocked/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumitsays.com/?p=179#comment-73</guid>
		<description>My head hurts, but in a good way. I&#039;m probably not getting all of the finer details, but I understand enough to follow the plot. I love what you&#039;re doing with the different information channels and the constant bombardment of input, the continual sharing as the characters jump bodies. This story gives me more on re-reading, and I like that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My head hurts, but in a good way. I&#8217;m probably not getting all of the finer details, but I understand enough to follow the plot. I love what you&#8217;re doing with the different information channels and the constant bombardment of input, the continual sharing as the characters jump bodies. This story gives me more on re-reading, and I like that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

