<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Courtship Considered As Twelve Variations On The Game Of Chess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sumitsays.com/2009/04/17/courtship-considered-as-twelve-variations-on-a-game-of-chess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/04/17/courtship-considered-as-twelve-variations-on-a-game-of-chess/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squarepetal</title>
		<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/04/17/courtship-considered-as-twelve-variations-on-a-game-of-chess/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Squarepetal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumitsays.com/stories/?p=54#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>But you don&#039;t even play chess!

How did you do it? I think you must have written the story and then applied the framework of rules although I&#039;m not certain as it&#039;s subtly played (did ya see…) :)

Brilliant idea to take the simple proverb &quot;love is a game&quot; and show the complexities of changing rules in each character&#039;s relationship year – to that end I think you should remove the king/queen icons you&#039;ve added at the start of each section, it oversimplifies and ruins the ending a little; I liked having to read on before I was sure this was a duel rather than a multi-character narrative and the troubling ambiguity of your abrupt ending after the heady movement in &quot;Triplet&quot;.

Who calls checkmate? It&#039;s her move and her stakes have risen from wanting to &quot;settle down&quot; to demanding the impossible, a man who is both &quot;unsuitable&quot; and &quot;perfect&quot;. Does this imply there is a winner and a looser? Is there defeat when the other wants to be captured? I&#039;m delighted that the story ends on a move without the rules made explicit – like the real life leap of faith lovers make.

Why did you keep the numbering? I&#039;m asking because it feels like an oversight rather than deliberate as &quot;checkmate &quot; is a move rather than a variant on the rules and the parallel thinking in &quot;Displacement&quot; and &quot;Triplet&quot; is amusingly obvious from their choice of expletive/intention without needing the duplication of number 10.

Alice and Kriegspiel are unbearable to read. The fatigue of friends who even &quot;stopped asking&quot; emphasises her isolation. Unbearable to write about too so I&#039;m overusing the delete key – anyway hope this gives you the reassurance that you&#039;ve got it right.

Not all doom and gloom thank god! &quot;Displacement&quot; is still making me laugh out loud! The panicky repetition of &quot;not&quot; and &quot;squiring&quot; being a deliciously awkward choice of word cranking up the painfulness of this tricky situation and most of all the stuttered string of in-head-dialogue-excuses:

 &quot;in an unspoken, non-negotiated agreement that he had grudgingly accepted for her sake, as conveyed by their mutual friends, not his own&quot;. Makes me think of Benedick in Much Ado About Nothing.

The second chance aspect of the plot is irresistible and you have captured the essence of flirtation with a well chosen perfectly placed &quot;peeking&quot;.

I held my breath!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you don&#8217;t even play chess!</p>
<p>How did you do it? I think you must have written the story and then applied the framework of rules although I&#8217;m not certain as it&#8217;s subtly played (did ya see…) <img src='http://sumitsays.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Brilliant idea to take the simple proverb &#8220;love is a game&#8221; and show the complexities of changing rules in each character&#8217;s relationship year – to that end I think you should remove the king/queen icons you&#8217;ve added at the start of each section, it oversimplifies and ruins the ending a little; I liked having to read on before I was sure this was a duel rather than a multi-character narrative and the troubling ambiguity of your abrupt ending after the heady movement in &#8220;Triplet&#8221;.</p>
<p>Who calls checkmate? It&#8217;s her move and her stakes have risen from wanting to &#8220;settle down&#8221; to demanding the impossible, a man who is both &#8220;unsuitable&#8221; and &#8220;perfect&#8221;. Does this imply there is a winner and a looser? Is there defeat when the other wants to be captured? I&#8217;m delighted that the story ends on a move without the rules made explicit – like the real life leap of faith lovers make.</p>
<p>Why did you keep the numbering? I&#8217;m asking because it feels like an oversight rather than deliberate as &#8220;checkmate &#8221; is a move rather than a variant on the rules and the parallel thinking in &#8220;Displacement&#8221; and &#8220;Triplet&#8221; is amusingly obvious from their choice of expletive/intention without needing the duplication of number 10.</p>
<p>Alice and Kriegspiel are unbearable to read. The fatigue of friends who even &#8220;stopped asking&#8221; emphasises her isolation. Unbearable to write about too so I&#8217;m overusing the delete key – anyway hope this gives you the reassurance that you&#8217;ve got it right.</p>
<p>Not all doom and gloom thank god! &#8220;Displacement&#8221; is still making me laugh out loud! The panicky repetition of &#8220;not&#8221; and &#8220;squiring&#8221; being a deliciously awkward choice of word cranking up the painfulness of this tricky situation and most of all the stuttered string of in-head-dialogue-excuses:</p>
<p> &#8220;in an unspoken, non-negotiated agreement that he had grudgingly accepted for her sake, as conveyed by their mutual friends, not his own&#8221;. Makes me think of Benedick in Much Ado About Nothing.</p>
<p>The second chance aspect of the plot is irresistible and you have captured the essence of flirtation with a well chosen perfectly placed &#8220;peeking&#8221;.</p>
<p>I held my breath!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Weaver</title>
		<link>http://sumitsays.com/2009/04/17/courtship-considered-as-twelve-variations-on-a-game-of-chess/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumitsays.com/stories/?p=54#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Oh bravo, I love stories structured around rules. Martin Amis uses &#039;zugzwang&#039; to fine effect in &#039;Money&#039;. But that is such an excellent punch line!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh bravo, I love stories structured around rules. Martin Amis uses &#8216;zugzwang&#8217; to fine effect in &#8216;Money&#8217;. But that is such an excellent punch line!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

